Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Presentation

Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Presentation

Childhood Obesity

The dissemination of an evidence-based practice project proposal is an important part of the final project. Dissemination of your project to a local association or clinical site/practice informs important stakeholders of evidence-based interventions that can improve clinical practice and ultimately patient outcomes.

For this assignment, develop a professional presentation that could be disseminated to a professional group of your peers.

Develop a 12-15 slide PowerPoint detailing your evidence-based practice project proposal. Create speaker notes of 100-250 words for each slide. For the presentation of your PowerPoint, use Loom to create a voice-over or a video. Refer to the topic Resources for additional guidance on recording your presentation with Loom. Include an additional slide for the Loom link at the beginning and an additional slide for References at the end. Be sure to consider your personal demeanor and tone during the recorded presentation. Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Presentation

Include the following in your presentation:

We will write
a custom nursing essay or paper
specifically for you
Get your first paper with
15% OFF
Get Help Now
  1. Introduction (include PICOT statement)
  2. Organizational Culture and Readiness
  3. Problem Statement and Literature Review
  4. Change Model, or Framework
  5. Implementation Plan
  6. Evaluation Plan
  7. Conclusion

You are required to cite a minimum of six peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

Refer to the resource, “Creating Effective PowerPoint Presentations,” located in the Student Success Center, for additional guidance on completing this assignment in the appropriate style.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Presentation

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Rubric Criteria

Collapse All Rubric CriteriaCollapse All

Introduction

6 points

Criteria Description

Introduction

  1. 5: Excellent

6 points

The introduction is succinct, captures the attention of the audience, clearly identifies PICOT statement and the fundamental aspects of the evidence-based practice project proposal that will be the main talking points and for the presentation.

  1. 4: Good

5.52 points

The introduction is adequate. The PICOT statement and the fundamental aspects of the evidence-based practice project proposal that will be the main talking points and PICOT statement for the presentation are discussed.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

5.28 points

The introduction generally presents the PICOT statement and most of the fundamental aspects of the evidence-based practice project proposal that will be the main talking points and for the presentation.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

4.8 points

The introduction omits key aspects of the PICOT and fundamental aspects of the evidence-based practice project proposal that will be the main talking points and PICOT statement for the presentation.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

An introduction is not included.

Organizational and Cultural Readiness

12 points

Criteria Description

Organizational and Cultural Readiness

  1. 5: Excellent

12 points

The organizational culture and readiness are thoroughly discussed and provide insight into the organization challenges.

  1. 4: Good

11.04 points

The organizational culture and readiness are adequately discussed and provide the necessary insight into the organization challenges.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

10.56 points

The organizational culture and readiness are generally discussed and provide insight into some of the challenges faced by the organization.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

9.6 points

The discussion on the organizational culture and readiness is incomplete.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

The discussion on the organizational culture and readiness is not included.

Problem Statement and Literature Review

18 points

Criteria Description

Problem Statement and Literature Review

  1. 5: Excellent

18 points

The problem statement is consistent throughout the presentation and concisely describes the issue using strong evidence-based support from the literature review to rationalize and justify the problem. The research from the literature review is current, relevant, and used to provide excellent rationale and support throughout.

  1. 4: Good

16.56 points

The problem describes the issue using evidence-based support from the literature review to rationalize and justify the problem. The research from the literature review is current, relevant, and used to provide adequate rationale and support throughout.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

15.84 points

The problem statement summarizes the issue and uses evidence-based support from some of the literature review to rationalize and justify the problem. The research from the literature review provides general support overall.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

14.4 points

The problem statement outlines the issue. Support from the research from the literature review is inconsistent.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

The problem statement is not clearly stated. Research from the literature review is not included.

Change Model or Framework

12 points

Criteria Description

Change Model or Framework

  1. 5: Excellent

12 points

The selected model or framework and its application to the proposed implementation are thoroughly described.

  1. 4: Good

11.04 points

The selected model or framework and its application to the proposed implementation are adequately described.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

10.56 points

The selected model or framework and its application to the proposed implementation are generally described.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

9.6 points

The selected model or framework is and its application to the proposed implementation are only partially described.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

The selected model or framework and its application to the proposed implementation are not described.

Implementation Plan

12 points

Criteria Description

Implementation Plan

  1. 5: Excellent

12 points

The implementation plan is thoroughly described and provides the details for the various aspects.

  1. 4: Good

11.04 points

The implementation plan is adequately described and provides the details for the various aspects.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

10.56 points

The implementation plan is generally described and provides an overall outline for the various aspects.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

9.6 points

The implementation plan is only partially described.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

The implementation plan is not described.

Evaluation Plan

12 points

Criteria Description

Evaluation Plan

  1. 5: Excellent

12 points

The evaluation plan is thoroughly described and provides the details for the various aspects.

  1. 4: Good

11.04 points

The evaluation plan is adequately described and provides key information for the various aspects.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

10.56 points

The evaluation plan is outlined and provides general information for most aspects.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

9.6 points

The evaluation plan is only partially described.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

The evaluation plan is not described.

Conclusion

6 points

Criteria Description

Conclusion

  1. 5: Excellent

6 points

The conclusion is short, clear and summarizes the key points of the presentation in a powerful and memorable way.

  1. 4: Good

5.52 points

The conclusion summarizes the key points of the presentation in a concise manner.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

5.28 points

The conclusion outlines the broad aspects of the presentation.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

4.8 points

The conclusion mentions some aspects of the presentation, but there are some key aspects missing.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

A conclusion is not presented.

Research

6 points

Criteria Description

Research

  1. 5: Excellent

6 points

Research is supportive of the rationale presented. Sources are distinctive. Addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.

  1. 4: Good

5.52 points

Research is timely and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

5.28 points

Research is adequate. Sources are standard in relevance, quality of outside sources, or timeliness.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

4.8 points

Few outside sources were used to support the assignment. Limited research is apparent.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

No outside sources were used to support the assignment.

Presentation

12 points

Criteria Description

Presentation PowerPoint, speaker notes, Loom voice over or video.

  1. 5: Excellent

12 points

The submission is presented effectively, and all of the required elements creatively contribute to the presentation of the concepts.

  1. 4: Good

11.04 points

The submission is presented effectively and contains all of the required elements.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

10.56 points

The submission contains minor inconsistencies that are not overly distracting. Presentation contains a majority of the required elements.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

9.6 points

The submission is ineffective, contains multiple inconsistencies, or is missing a few of the required elements.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

The submission is incoherent, contains major inconsistencies, is not presented effectively, or is missing a substantial amount of the required elements.

Aesthetic Quality

6 points

Criteria Description

Aesthetic Quality

  1. 5: Excellent

6 points

Design is clean. Skillful handling of text and visuals creates a distinctive and effective presentation. Overall, effective and functional audio, text, or visuals are evident.

  1. 4: Good

5.52 points

Design is appropriate and integrates a variety of objects, charts, and graphs to amplify the message.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

5.28 points

Design is fairly clean, with a few exceptions. Materials add to, not detract from the presentation. Materials used were quality products and easy to see or hear.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

4.8 points

Design detracts from purpose. Text and visuals are too simplistic, cluttered, and busy. Little or no creativity or inventiveness is present.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Design is cluttered. Materials detract from the content or the purpose of presentation is low quality.

Synthesis

6 points

Criteria Description

Synthesis

  1. 5: Excellent

6 points

Synthesis is unique. Synthesis shows careful planning and attention to how disparate elements fit together. The combination of elements is verified.

  1. 4: Good

5.52 points

Synthesis integrates ideas to form a cohesive whole. Combination of elements is logical and justified.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

5.28 points

Synthesis integrates ideas but does not adequately form a cohesive whole. Combination of elements at times is confusing.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

4.8 points

Synthesis integrates ideas inadequately. The combination of elements is not logical.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Synthesis does not successfully integrate ideas to form a cohesive whole. The combination of elements is not logical and/or verifiable.

Mechanics of Writing

6 points

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing Includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use.

  1. 5: Excellent

6 points

The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

  1. 4: Good

5.52 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

5.28 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

4.8 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed.

Documentation of Sources

6 points

Criteria Description

Documentation of Sources Citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style.

  1. 5: Excellent

6 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

  1. 4: Good

5.52 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

5.28 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

4.8 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

 

PICOT Final

Name_____________________________________

 

Complete your PICOT using your approved proposed nursing practice problem. If they were approved, you may use the population and intervention developed in your Topic 1 assignment. Include any necessary revisions in this submission. Refer to the “Example PICOT” below as needed for guidance on how to complete the PICOT.

PICOT Question
P Population Children and adolescents with childhood Obesity
I Intervention Limiting screen time through education to children and families
C Comparison             No education at all
O Outcome Reduce the Obesity rates
T Timeframe Six Months
PICOT

Create a complete PICOT statement.

 In children and adolescents with obesity(P), Can educating children and families(I) compared to no education at all (C) reduce the childhood obesity rates (O) in six months (T)?

 

 
Problem Statement

Create a problem statement for your PICOT. You will use this problem information throughout your final written paper.

 

 Childhood obesity is a condition in which a child is significantly overweight for age and height, and an estimated 19.3% of US children and adolescents are obese. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, every 1 in 5 children and adolescents are affected by childhood obesity in the United States (2022). Excessive screen time increases the risk of childhood overweight and obesity by reducing physical activity engagement, increasing the consumption of unhealthy foods, and decreasing nighttime sleep duration (Goncalves et al., 2019). Another Journal by Fang et al. signifies that extended screen time accompanied by lower physical activity, high-calorie food, and sedentary behavior leads to obesity (2019). Children with severe obesity are at greater risk for dyslipidemia, hypertension, type 2 diabetes, cancer, and fatty liver disease (Bendor et al., 2020). Also, obesity and cardiovascular morbidity, diabetes, and cancer are associated with negatively impacting their quality of life. Media-related technologies such as video games, smartphones, and television have exposed children to prolonged screen time, exacerbating the risk of being overweight. This health outcome negatively impacts the healthcare structure due to increased workload. To improve health outcomes, children and families must be educated about childhood obesity, screen time, and related risks and encourage parents to limit screen time. According to an article, it is imperative to address the parents’ educational level and understanding of the need to treat obesity through lifestyle changes (Jester et al., 2018). Parents and caregivers with proper education on the causes and consequences of childhood obesity can help prevent childhood obesity (Sanyaolu et al., 2019). Parents and children’s, educational programs regarding the benefits of reducing screen times will help them understand the risks.

 

References

Bendor, C. D., Bardugo, A., Hamiel, O. P., Afek, A., & Twig, G. (2020). Cardiovascular morbidity, diabetes and cancer risk among children and adoloscents with severe obesity. Cardiovascular Diabetology, 79(2020). https://cardiab.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12933-020-01052-1#citeas

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2022, April 1). Overweight & Obesity. CDC. https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/childhood/index.html

Fang, K., Mu, M., Liu, K., & He, Y. (2019). Screen time and childhood overweight/obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Child; Care, Health & Development, 45(5), 744–753. https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.12701

Goncalves, W. F., Byrne, R., Viana, M. T., & Trost, S. G. (2019). Parental influences on screen time and weight status among preschool children from Brazil: a cross-sectional study. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 16, Article 27(2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-019-0788-3

Jester, A., Kreider, K. E., Ochberg, R., & Meek, J. (2018). Effectiveness of Implementing Initial Education Stasrtegies to Promote Awareness and Healthy Habits in Childhood Obesity: A Quality Improvement Project. Journal of Pediatric Health Care, 32(2), 157–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedhc.2017.09.006

Sanyaolu, A., Okorie, C., Qi, X., Locke, J., & Rehman, S. (2019). Childhood and Adolescent Obesity in the United States: A Public Health Concern. Global Pediatric Health, 6, Article 2333794X19891305. https://doi.org/10.1177/2333794X19891305

 

Related Samples

  1. The value of a human person Sample Discussion Essay
  2. Evidence-Based Proposal and Annotated Bibliography on Technology in Nursing
  3. Nursing Advanced Health Assestment of a case
  4. Nursing Theory, APA